Unlock the Watch Watch Bety House newsletter for free
Your guide is on what the Trump’s second term is for Washington, Business and the World
Original sin This is an awesome name for book It covers 2023 to 2024. This means that readers will be delivered to the final root of the problem – the problem is that Donald Trump is in the White House – if the authors actually lead them in the footsteps of no more than two years ago. It was then that the outdated Joe Biden decided to run for the president again. It was a terrible decision. The cover of his delicate state was even worse. The peers who did not urge him to go until the television discussion was subjected to his deprivation last summer.
But it was nothing “origin”. Biden has become a goat of the release for a much longer democratic problem, which is a tolerance for likely and frequently proven elections.
When it was a sin, the fall, it was the choice of Democrats Hillary Clinton as a presidential candidate in 2016. World History has included this single Piegda act. Polls told parts that voters did not like her. She had already soared over the young Barack Obama in the primaries eight years earlier. However, her low reputation has never been fair. She is not a scammer and much more hypocritical than other politicians, but only one of the vitality. But the world is like that. The Democrats decided to ignore the objective fact of its unpopularity, and the result is the Trump era, which is likely to avoid.
The second event that led us to where we were today is the elevation of Kamala Harris as a partner Biden in 2020. Given his age, the Democrats did not call the future president. Again, they were spoiled by the clues of its restrictions. She became the first candidate to come out of the primaries. Those who overcame it included the mayor of the fourth largest Indiana city.
Biden carries a nominal guilt for choosing it as an associate, but the “choice” is a deceptive word. There was a silent democratic rule that a white man could not run with another white man. So there is no pita Butig. Senator Minnesota Amy Klobuchar was a strong performer, but also became interested in the recent history and policy of the state, in which George Flow had just been killed, which was only excluded. Is there another party that represents itself?
In general, Baiden’s refusal in the last decades ranks third in the list of democratic nonsense. The problem is not one person. The problem is the collective misconception model about the candidates who return to the previous century. Take a look at the defeat stocks. Not since the Republican Barri Goldvoter improperly evaluated the nominee and electoration as badly as the Democrats with George McGaverne, Walter Mondile and Michael Dukakis.
In 50-50 nations, Democrats are always competitive today. As a result, it is easy to miss the stunning narrowness of their candidates. Tim Waltz was the first person either at the top or at the lower half of the democratic presidential ticket since 1980, who has not gone to law school. At the top of the millennium, there was no southerner on top, despite the distrust that the Democrats should overcome there. In November last year, the Party of California (which did not vote for Republicans from the 1980s) and Minnesota (which did not even vote in the Republican in the 1980s), which he correctly described as an existential for the Constitution. This is a party that is always ready to meet conservative voters who relate to one tenth of the way.
To be bad in choosing a leader, you need badly in politics. Whatever it seems, it matters in this trade, such as ideas and tactics, it flows from the paramount person in the party. Good leaders are usually correct. I like Harris, either Edo Milibanda, or Jeremy Corbin in the UK, will not be reliable. If this logic seems circular – “winners win” – I’m afraid it is a politician. Must be more research and comments on what is “this”, otherwise known as X-Factor than on a company, manifestos and other releases Policies whose study is an exercise in viewing the telescope from the wrong end.
The question is why, in particular, the Democrats are so often mistaken when choosing a leadership. Perhaps the left parties are necessarily softer to the weakness of the person. The impetus that causes them to protect people without profitable skills from market forces (good thing) is the impulse that causes them to highlight voters without hopgers (bad). This would explain why the work in the UK had the same problem: for each Dukakis, a movie.
Can it be that the progressive ones learning to think in terms of structural forces consider the emphasis on individual talent as non -intellectual. Increasingly, the Democrat is the one who pushes Trump to academic abstractions – neoliberalism, oligarchy – but evades the work without choosing a wonderful candidate’s turkey every four years.
In any case, this problem was preceded and could pass Biden’s years. Even if he quit earlier, the Democrats, in all likelihood, still chose Harris from respect for work experience and those unproven identity standards. With a greater company, which means, more exposition of its hoax syntax and opaque beliefs, I think it would make it even worse against Trump than it. Original sin exposes the elder Democrats as Titanic people. “We so twisted Biden as a party,” says one Grande. “We have been so tired of the party as the world,” one reader murmured.
