Openai has called a court ruling Since last month, this forces you to retain Chatgpt data indefinitely as part of a case violation of copyright taken by The New York Times By 2023. The CEO, Sam Altman, said in a tweet on X that the judge’s decision “compromises the privacy of our users and” establishes a bad bad “.
In May, Federal Judge Ona Wang ordered Openai to preserve and secrete all the Chatgpt’s departure registration data that would otherwise be deleted due to a user request. He said that the sentence was justified because the volume of deleted conversations is “significant”. The directive states that the judge asked Openai if there was a way to anonymize the data to address user privacy problems.
The New York Times He sought the order so that they can trackly track how often Openai violates their IP, including the instances when users requested the removal of chats. A federal judge allowed to proceed with the original case, according to the Nowthe argument that Openai and MicrosoftTechnology had induced users to plagiarize their materials.
In a None Instead, Openai painted the order as a privacy problem without addressing the millions of alleged copyright violations. “This conflict mainly with the privacy commitments we have assumed with our users,” the company wrote. “He abandons long -term privacy rules and weakens privacy protections.” Openai said that the order “does not affect Chatgpt Enterprise or Chatgpt Edu customers.”
It Now And other cases of Copyright of the AI are still ongoing, as the courts have not yet decided whether Openai, Google and other companies violated copyrights on a mass scale scraping internet material. Technology companies have argued that training is protected by copyright law for “fair use” and that demands threaten the AI industry. The creators of this content, in turn, argue that it hurts their own livelihoods stealing and reproducing works with little or no compensation.
