Each week, Netflix It presents its 10 best lists of the previous week, ranking –S TV shows and movies by vision. This week, the Netflix Titan: The submersible disaster of Oceangate was no. 2 Movie in the Top 10 of Netflix, but the documentary on the mortality of the sub -Sersible Titan implosion is not the only film about the catastrophic underground tragedy.
Another, Max’s implosion: The Titanic sub -raise came out in May. Both reveal the lengths that the Explorer and CEO of Oceangate Rush Stockton was sent to send his innovative but defective submerged to the depths of the Titanic, but is one of those films better or more informative than the others?
The two films are convincing, and each presents key testimonies with first -hand knowledge and experience on board the sub -sub -UNDERS -which offer unique perspectives, saying that the implosion of the Sub was inevitable. The same points are made in both documents, but the information does not feel too repetitive. That is why they complement each other and offer a clearer photo of what happened when it met. I hate to say (for the sake of time), but if you invest in the subject, it is worth seeing it both. But if you had to choose one, I have a recommendation.
Both Titan documentaries reached the transmission around the second anniversary of the final, Fatal Dive of Titan, on June 18, 2023. They both said that they precipitated to be aware of the defects and security concerns about Titan, and despite the many complainants around him, he chose to say goodbye. (Titan had several problems, but the two were his cylindrical form, which did not distribute the pressure evenly, and the fact that it was built with an experimental carbon fiber helmet, a material that had not been proven enough to withstand the background pressure in the depths of the Titanic.) The Netflix document, for most, presents interviews with old Oceangate employees and indicates a defective company that required a company that required a culture of the Oceangate company. A culture of the company that needed a culture of the company that needed a culture of (a company that needed a company that needed a culture of (which a company did (which a company stated (which pointed to a company (pointed to a culture of (a company said (a culture of (did not point out a company (it indicated a culture of (did not make a culture of (as it shows, anyone who showed the film. Propering the concern for defective science was forced.
Lochridge was a high -level employee of the company who would eventually be fired to express his concerns about Titan design and was then threatened with a demand for Oceangate when he sought to make his security claims public. The documentary includes audio and video recordings of strokes between Lochridge and Rush, and images of an immersion to see the wreck in Andrea Doria, which required Lochridge to pilot the path of evil after Rush be put on his boat under the ship of the wreck. Lochridge is just one of the several former Oceangate employees in the film that left the company because they refused to be complicit in a potential situation that could place participants bewildered in a detrimental way. But Lochridge’s anger in Rush – and the result of the Titan – is evident. “He wanted fame,” says Lochridge de Rush at the end of the Netflix documentary. “First. To feed his ego. Fame. That was what he wanted, and he has it.”
The Discovery Documentary, Implosion: The Titanic SubasterIn Max, he includes interviews with some of the same players as Netflix Doc, but focuses on the U.S. Costera Guard’s research on the implosion of the Sub and interviews with Josh Gates, presenter of the unknown Discovery expedition. Gates himself has been aboard the Titan and was planning to submit the submersible in an episode of his show, but he worried so after the “cascade of problems” that the sub -experimented in his journey refused to broadcast the images he had planned to produce. “It wasn’t just a red flag for me,” Gates said about Rush’s attitude towards Titan security measures, “it was like a flare.” The film also includes images not included in the Netflix documentary at the time that the Topside ship lost communication with Titan, a haunted scene that shows Rush’s wife, Wendy, the communications director on board, asking -Li: what was that bang? ” After losing contact with the sub.
I followed the story of Titan casually when the sub -pair disappeared in June 2023. Essentially I believed it was a terrible and tragic accident. But after seeing these two documentaries, it seems that the implosion of the Titan could have been avoided. The submersible was missing for four days, and in that time the world in general maintained a certain hope that it was simply missing and those of the immersion were safe somewhere in the North Atlantic. But both films make it clear that anyone who met with Titan knew immediately when they felt that the sub -author who suffered the same fate as Titanic himself.
Lochridge stories of his time in Oceangate at Netflix Doc help paint Rush Stockton as a reluctant to admit his business’s shortcomings and his testimony is only impressive to see. But if he had to suggest only one of these films to watch, Max’s version, which has witnesses to the Costera Guard’s research, an interview with Christine Dawood, the wife and mother of two of the victims on board, and the images of Josh Gates on his own trip to Titan, they simply answer more questions about how this disaster took place and the impact he left behind. But most likely, if you see one of them, you will hook you and see the two anyway, like me.
