Rangers It has remembered the Tv, she will monitor the TV broadcast on the club because £ 3,000 for comments made by the former chocolate IBrox player.
Co-Commentator in Easter The road on May 17, Brown is prevented when Rangers rejected the purpose of the destination is unlawful after the Hibe Deferder Rocky Bushiri Scrascled to delete effort that there is net net net net net.
With the Boss Interim Bas Barry Ferguson, the football has crossed the line, the hair went up the park and the same matches completed 2-2 matches.
It does not have Walsh Walsh reaches, an assistant or var andrew Dallas can accompany that Belgian effort must stand, and Brown says it is a corup. ‘Tom Miller’s’ Commentator says: ‘Yes, I’m not sure we can say that.’ But Brown replied: ‘Well, I said’.
Rangers yesterday Hits with financial penalty for chocolate words, but claim ‘more comments on abroad platforms without consequences of the fly.
Found in violation of discipline rules 38 by the court panel, the Ibrox swear club to monitor all the broadcasts will move forward.
Rangers are installed £ 3,000 for comments made in the air by former John Brown player
Outburs ‘corruption’ she follows controversy whether the ball is crossing the line or not against hibs on the Passover road
Rangers denies goals after referee Walsh and officials could not conclude that the ball crossed the line
Strong statements read: ‘We feel necessary to highlight a larger concern of concerns that can be produced and improved for clarity and confidence (The SFA).
‘John Brown speaks emotional and spontaneous as a person who cares about the club.
‘The words are not by script and they are not a formal club commander.
‘The advantage, however, say predictions where spontaneous comments, made during a clear rofefeing live coverage of enough to trigger the official sanction.
‘This is not a proportional or consistent, especially when other clubs make strongest comments on official platforms without consequences.
‘As part of the present, we choose many examples of the same incident in the club channel.
‘This happens to express the questions about FA Scotland rules about the Scotland FA rule and consequently they are reinforced. For knowledge, none can lead to the case because it causes the cost against the same club.
‘Less consistency with Scotland plain in the same event with more questions than answers.
Rangers claimed a contributor to other club TV broadcasts have made comments ‘strongest’ instead of chocolate, on top, but it has not been sentenced by the SFA
Andrew Dallas is a var on Easter road, but it can’t conclude the goalline occurrence
‘So, we will contact Scotland and Presidential Executives for the policy and processing the repair, if there is, to ensure consistent approaches and proportions for members club.
‘We will also ask Scotland, if they receive that the rules cannot be continuously at all clubs and all platforms lost due to the fair and can do.
‘Our purpose here is to understand the rational at the end of different results. The deficiency of consistency, or perception of the confidence, experienced confidence in the discipline process and expose all member clubs for uncertainty to do and not allowed.
‘There is no clear guide about the expected clubs to manage the direct broadcast content, even if we recorded a recognized panel that the club’s internal editorial guidelines might be a constructive step for others that will go forward.
‘So obviously, we show more examples that will not recommend, then they should return sanctions, but to highlight an obvious consistency about the same thing.
‘Club media channels, naturally, passionate and partisan. Informal Comments, Mother-in-cheeks equipped with regions, especially in direct settings.
‘However, choose to pursue this case, Scotland has opened the door to find the same situation it handled forward. If this is the default, they will be found closely to ensure that it is applicable in space, with continuous, without exception and without the favor. ‘
Rangers have declined violating the SFA rules and claim the main defensive PAT PANG PHONE that extends the injury not awarded.
Head of Hampden Wissi Willie Collum Touching Offications in the Controversy in Easter Road
With defense, Collum describes the purpose of not permitted to Celtic against Hibs that also causes an officer criticism
Four than five Panel Panels 5 – Individuals with experience from all games – retrospective feel their goals should be awarded by visitors.
Although there is a Hampden Head of the Hampden Head of Weli Willie Collum Touch the Match Office.
Talking about the virgin show, he pointed criticism to the officials after he revealed Maeda Maeda against when the ball was judged to prepare ‘target’.
‘Let’s get back to the two events – Celtic hobs vs. Celtic, can ball in line, and HubBalle United vs, can be a horn before entering the destination,’ speaking Collum.
‘We are criticized for both of these decisions, and correctly, because the end is not the evidence.
‘I know people who will look at this decision and say: “Camera angle, for me, it is a good idea. But the fact, the camera angle is in the corner of the view, there is nothing right right there.
‘I’ve quoted before, in the World Cup match, there are the same angles that are shown in the Japanese game (to Spain in 2022) where, if you will use the ball through the line.
‘Then when you line directly on the line, it only takes a little part of the ball to touch the line.
‘What is the Var and AVAR under the bottom of the caterels, 100 percent, say the ball through the line? Not for us.
‘Do I think cross the line? I think it’s a good opportunity.
‘But do I really believe? Not.
‘We’ve been criticized before, we have now said that we will give you a decision as if we get a conclusive evidence 100 percent, so var and AVAR is correct to say that they do not have the evidence.’
